Sure enough. Thank you very much.
I'd like to come back to a question I attempted to ask you earlier, which is about the influence of the military domestically, in addition to their participation in some instances, and their not being clear protocols such that they are not involved when they don't need to be.
In Canada, it's the same thing. A municipal leader, a provincial premier, similar to a governor, is responsible for declaring states of emergency. At that point, they call in the federal government for assistance, if they need it. It's very similar, just using different terminology.
Yet I worry, particularly given some of your comments in the first hour, about a dramatic increase or a dramatic military oversight of what I see as a civilian and local—by which I mean provincial—responsibility to repair downed infrastructure, for example. Again, going back to the case over the holidays when the power was out, you heard some opposition politicians talking about bringing in the military. I have the largest military land base in the country in my riding. The military doesn't have the capacity to string up lines. There is a function they can serve, but calling in the military is actually not always the best solution.
Could I get your comments on that?