That's interesting. I think you make a good point but do we not risk.... I'm going to touch on where I think Mr. Daniel is going with the sectoral approach or even what I'm beginning to wonder, which is if a macro versus a micro approach is better. Let me give you a small example, the one you raised, with AP, I think you said, in highlighting the false news feed.
I would think, at the end of the day, we want to hope it's AP's responsibility to protect against those kinds of attacks. That organization has the most to lose by an attack: misinformation. People then question their data; they look elsewhere. Similarly, my concern would be if we hold another entity responsible for bank data, no one's really accountable for it. I haven't come to any conclusion, but should banks not be responsible for their security? If we keep elevating it, ultimately, no one might be responsible for control. The backdrop to all this is that to me, working in this environment you have to be nimble, you have to evolve, you have to recognize threats, you have to be able to assess, and it strikes me that, ultimately, government is the place where you're least going to find that kind of thinking or approach. Don't get me wrong, governments do some things very well.