I would anticipate we would buy off the shelf from a foreign provider, and that's largely the U.S. In more modest ways even Israel has capacities on this that they could share. I don't think we would be excluded from something like the Global Hawk if we wanted to do that seriously; that is, I think we could be trusted with that technology, and it could be sold to us.
As to the difference between the jet Global Hawk at quite high altitude, 50,000 feet and more, and the Predator, which is a propellor-driven vehicle and more like 25,000 feet probably, there are differences in what resolution the sensors will have and what field of vision, what sort of coverage, can be offered.
My view would be to favour the higher altitude and the longer endurance, despite high-altitude winds—I believe that kind of weather can be addressed—and despite the intervening clouds. Essentially, if clouds are a problem, they're a problem below 25,000 feet as well, so I don't see that argument excluding the high-altitude one. The cost may. I think they're much more costly, and to my understanding there's a bigger support package required for the Global Hawk, for the high-altitude jet.