I should just say something quickly. Remember earlier I showed you the small ones, the medium ones, and the big ones. The big ones are not better than the small ones, and vice versa. For example, you have the Mexico border with the United States and they have, let's say, one $22-million Predator flying alone. Or you could put a small one in every patrol vehicle and cover hundreds of points along the border for the same money. I'm not saying that's necessarily the way you want to go either, but the military uses pistols, rifles, and artillery, big to small. It's the same thing with robots. The Predators are not better than the little guys; the little guys aren't better than the big ones.
For example, you can put a little one over a city or a population a lot more safely than a big one. It can loiter and just sit there if it's some sort of helicopter, so you can get persistent surveillance. The big ones go further and longer and they get a bigger swath, but they're not very close and you can't fly them over Toronto, for example. If you're looking at the vast open spaces of the north, you're looking at a big system, obviously. If you're talking about urban areas, the Thousand Islands, that kind of thing, you're going to want to look at a much smaller system—a bunch of much smaller systems.
When you say they have to be operated, there's not that much operation left. You kind of tell it what to do and then go have coffee, right? The machine will fly the GPS route that you've told it to fly and the video will come in. It's not a labour-intensive process at all.