The world is a long way behind in the defence part as opposed to the offensive part of UAVs.
For example a couple of months ago two UAVs were found crashed in South Korea that had originated from North Korea. They were dinky little things, but they had filmed the presidential palace and a few military installations. They caused cabinet crisis meetings and all sorts of things.
Now the South Koreans are looking to buy a system with advanced radars because that's what you need to find very small machines and some sort of defensive system that they want to build. That's going to be an enormous program. The Americans—DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency—are working on all kinds of solutions such as counter drones, but this is a big problem. Guys are dropping drugs into prisons in Canada with little UAVs. They just fly it over, drop the drugs, and fly away.
There isn't a good counter system for that. You can't jam the frequencies because they are using regular frequencies most of the time. A prison, for example, can't blanket-jam all the frequencies around it. This is an issue that hasn't quite been solved yet. We've also seen some video recently of guys flying small UAVs near aircraft in Toronto and Vancouver in the flight path. We need some counter systems and we need a system within the government. As Mr. Barlow said earlier it's tough to procure new stuff. It's really tough to procure new stuff until we have a major incident with a UAV and then everybody is going to be jumping around looking for some sort of good system, to defend.