I think you have to look at that package and that strategy as a bunch of constituent parts. We're only starting to see some of the governance structures being put in place right now. It's also supposed to be accompanied by a revised industrial offset policy, which is still very much in its infancy and hasn't been fully fleshed out.
There are also components such as third party review and outside review at many different stages of the process, which are only just starting to come into effect.
I think that holistically there's definitely an opportunity for that to improve things in the sense of preventing key files from running into big problems. I think it's kind of important to contextualize some of the difficulties we've had. It's not as if the Department of National Defence can't buy anything, but certain key files, the big ones, the complex ones, have run into very significant difficulty.
If these changes can help improve the process such that those big projects aren't hitting the major roadblocks that our fighter file has and that our fixed-wing search and rescue had, for instance, then I think things will improve.
That being said, I think a number of the other issues that I'm highlighting, regardless of whatever the governance process is, can be strengthened in terms of budgeting, particularly in terms of resourcing. Unless you actually get enough resources and people with the right kinds of training in place, no matter how significant the improvements to governance and these other processes are, they're not going to have maximum impact.