I appreciate your comments on the efficiency with which the C-17s and the C-130Js were purchased. I understand that these are production models that were purchased. It's not quite like buying a car off the assembly line, but essentially, it's buying something that's already designed and being built, and it's a question of acquisition. As well, of course, the Chinook-Ds were bought from the U.S. forces, again without a procurement rollout, design, or anything like that.
I can understand why we could be efficient at that—and there is nothing wrong with being efficient in that aspect as well—but we have had problems, of course, with the JSS, which was ready to go to tender in 2008 and then was cancelled for a strange budget reason, which was that there wasn't enough money allocated at some point in the process.
I didn't have a chance to ask Mr. Forster this, although he did talk about how money is managed. Are there ideas about solving those problems? Sometimes we have money left over at the end of the year. At other times, changing the way the money goes could actually solve a problem so that it wouldn't leave us waiting until 2021 to get new supply ships, for example. Is there a way to deal with that? Or is that something we're stuck with forever?