I think that's super-helpful in this context. Thank you for that point.
I'll go back to peacekeeping for a second.
In my mind three cultures have to be broken down to ensure parity, or at least the approach toward parity in peacekeeping.
The first one is the culture of the troop-contributing country. The second is the culture of whatever coalition is going to gather to solve the problem, whether that's NATO or the UN or some other constellation. The last one is the culture in the host government, less euphemistically the target government.
Is that the right way to think about it? If so, where do you see the greatest obstacles at the moment in the research that you're doing, and at which level? Could you speak from a Canadian perspective, perhaps?
Is it the NATO coalition or the UN coalitions where you have peacekeeping cultures from all around the world coalescing? Then the significance of women being part of it is usually secondary or tertiary or even less frank than that, but then you also have cultures in the countries we're assisting where it may not be helpful culturally to consider putting a woman into a leadership position.