First of all, it behooves us to see women as agents broadly, as you've expressed there. I will attempt to give an answer to that. My first response would be that we need the data. We need to do the research. We're at the learning spot. In fact, this is a place where Canada could provide some leadership, by gathering that data, both qualitative and quantitative—I'm thinking about Bruce, since we have an academic here—to dive into those conversations, as well as data points. I think there's an opportunity here.
The blunt truth is that we don't know yet. In fact, what we hear from those of us who have been on missions in the past is that women in conflict states are often not that thrilled to see peacekeepers at all. They want the peace, but it's not magic for them to simply see the blue berets.
I am hopeful. There is some indication that the presence of women throughout the peace ops and peace-building system will make a difference, because women will see their roles. Of course, it will change their roles. You've heard about Afghanistan or other patriarchies, where—to use a male analogy—we're moving the goal sticks forward on gender writ large. In our own societies, we know that we have benefited enormously from this, in terms of peace, rule of law, prosperity, and so on.
We have indications that it will make a positive difference. Your question is important, because I think Canada can contribute to collecting some of that data.