I would say that what has really been successful has been transparency. Ukraine has introduced e-declarations of all assets of more than $100,000. Officials—so all parliamentarians, all ministers, all ministerial staff—have to declare what they have. They have declared an amazing amount. The average holding in cash of parliamentarians in Ukraine at home turned out to be $700,000—note that's dollars, not Ukrainian currency.
This has put a basis, and this has named and shamed the parliamentarians publicly over what they had, and it was the same with a lot of other officials. Also, ownership of most enterprises, for example, of all banks, has been redeemed.
Transparency works, and Ukraine is adamant on continuing that.
When it comes to law enforcement, it has not been so successful. Here it's particularly the security service and the prosecutor general's office that are in trouble.
You might have heard today that the Ukraine Parliament pushed for the sacking of the prosecutor general, who tendered his resignation today, but the majority refuted it. Also, the minister of the interior who has been exposed in this specific case. The media are very good, but all these cases do come out. The board does not function its prosecution and judgments, so this is what really needs to be improved.