Thank you for your question.
First, the bill would give a judge the right to make court orders.
Examples would be, abstaining from communicating with the victims, non-disclosure orders, publication bans, as well as preventing an accused person from directly cross-examining the victim.
As well, the right to protection would entail three important things. The first is regarding the security and privacy of victims, as considered by military authorities, and I'll let my colleague Colonel Lortie fill in the details on that. Second, it would also provide reasonable and necessary measures to protect the victim from intimidation and retaliation. Third, as I alluded to before in a previous question, it would also identify protection and testimonial aids on request.
In all, it's envisioned that there is a cadre of mechanisms that are available to military authorities to better protect victims.