Well, sir, when both the minister and the JAG, and I, for that matter, were here in the previous meeting, they undertook to look at this issue. I can say that we continue to do that.
From a statistical perspective, in answer to your question, since 2000, section 98 of the NDA has been used 17 times. Four charges were preferred to court martial, which means the Canadian military prosecution service decided to proceed with the charges via the court martial: three charges were under paragraph 98(a)—I know that's not the issue here—malingering; and one was under paragraph 98(b), aggravating disease or injury. All four of those charges were withdrawn at trial. Thirteen charges under section 98 were disposed of at summary trial: 10 charges were under paragraph 98(a) of the NDA. Eight charges resulted in a finding of guilty; two charges were stayed. There were two charges under paragraph 98(b). One charge resulted in a finding of guilty and one charge was stayed. One charge under paragraph 98(c), injuring self or another under the NDA, was laid, but this charge was not proceeded with.
Based on what I've just stated, since the year 2000 there was one charge laid under paragraph 98(c) of the National Defence Act. You may recall that the last time I was before the committee I alluded to it as the modern military justice system, if you will, following the changes that were made in 1999.