That's an excellent question.
Currently, there's no requirement in the regulation for the presiding officer at summary trial to give reasons for the decision. That decision is encapsulated in a record of disciplinary proceedings, whether the member is found guilty or not guilty. Certainly, as I talked about the last time I was before this committee, there are a number of mechanisms that a member who's found guilty can pursue: a review under Queen's Regulations and Orders 108.45 and another mechanism under Queen's Regulations and Orders 116.02 that a commanding officer can initiate a review.
The penultimate review, if you will, would be for the Federal Court to review that decision. Those are the steps in the current system.