I will say that there have not been many cases that were judicially reviewed in the summary trial system, to my knowledge—again I'm going off memory. But a recent case, Petty Officer Thurrott, was heard before the Federal Court, as you probably know, sir. Generally speaking, although the case didn't fall on the constitutionality of the summary trial system, the court suggested strongly that there were no charter issues in terms of Petty Officer Thurrott's concerns.
Generally speaking, just in terms of the structure of the current summary trial process, that's how it would work. I did mention as well QR and O article 116.02, which is a commanding officer review. If for some reason it's brought to the attention of the chain of command that there were some issues with the process, then that is a mechanism in which the chain of command can initiate a review to the next level to address any concerns.