Service offences are set forth in the NDA and they're further clarified in the regulation. As I alluded to before vis-à-vis a summary trial, if I, as a member of the Canadian Armed Forces, am charged with an offence and there is a summary trial, I am found guilty and I receive a punishment, I have a mechanism for review that is set forth in regulation. I spoke about that earlier. Ultimately, the penultimate recourse that I would have would be to judicially review that. Therefore, ab initio, there is no right, if you will, in the current system for a member to appeal a summary trial ruling to the Court Martial Appeal Court. The Court Martial Appeal Court deals only with courts martial.
As you know, the sanctions are set out in the proposed legislation. In proposed section 162.7, in the scale of sanctions, we have reduction in rank; severe reprimand, reprimand, deprivation of pay for not more than 18 days, and the minor sanctions which we talked about before and which will be set out by the Governor in Council.
Just to draw an analogy with the current summary trial system, the summary hearing system would envision a review authority as well, which is set out in proposed section 163.6, where the chief of the defence staff and other review authorities would have the ability to conduct a review of a summary finding.