Mr. Chair, I accept Mr. Bezan's argument, but my submission is that the right answer, the right mechanism, is good regulatory definition of what confinement to barracks entails. If that is deemed to be an outcome akin to criminal sentencing, then a higher burden of proof would be appropriate. If it is an administrative sanction, then the balance of probabilities burden would be required or applied.
Really, it's a question again of having the right regulatory definitions consistent, transparent and accessible to all members of the Canadian Forces.