It's not so much as a question, but one thing I've been trying to do over the last couple of years is remind everybody that we have this binational agreement with the U.S. called NORAD. When it's out of sight and out of mind, it can be easily marginalized. I'm also starting to see signs that NORAD itself is thinking about how it can evolve and change, and this will have repercussions for Canada. I'm hoping that we're going to be able to keep pace to evaluate those suggestions, so that we're not doing it in an ad hoc fashion.
I think the brilliance of NORAD was that Canada and the U.S. came together and saw the need for this agreement. In fact, we have to remember that the military actually got ahead of the official signing of the treaty. We don't want to do that again.
But to pay attention, to go to NORAD, to ask them questions.... For example, as we considered the Arctic offshore patrol vessels, how would they fit in with NORAD? That's a question we don't often ask ourselves, and I think it's an important question.