That's right. At the end of the day, as I explained in my opening remarks, the total cost or the total life cycle of a ship includes many things other than just building the ship itself. We have the operation and maintenance, the training of the crews, and the long-term supportability. We are expecting all those things to add up to over $111 billion over the course of 20 to 30 years. Also, given that we keep our ships a very long time, there are probably additional activities that would go on there.
With respect to simulation and training, or at least what you would call training crews, crew rotations, and the like, the navy itself most likely—and this is me assuming—will be looking at how they're going to structure their crew loads, how they're going to train and whether it would be a virtual ship ashore, how many ships they need for training, and how many ships will be operational at any given time. I would defer to the RCN on that.
I can certainly tell you from an industry perspective that in this country we have some of the most world-leading training and simulation. I happened to be a part of that world for about 20 years. Not only do we have one company that does this, but we have many, and I imagine they are actively participating right now in the Canadian surface combatant competition in order to put those products and services on the table.