The deputy minister and I will tag-team the answer. I'll speak to the evolution of the mission and the potential requirements going forward.
In the last round, the minister spoke to the nature of the mission. Clearly, as the situation in Iraq, particularly in the context of Mosul, the liberation thereof, evolves and we get a better sense of what the emerging needs are of the Iraqi security forces themselves, we'll have to look at the nature of our current contribution to the coalition, and the number of options related to how we either reinforce certain things that we're doing or potentially shift forces or shift the focus.
As it relates to any specifics, it really is too early to tell. It is such a dynamic and fluid situation on the ground that it would be premature of us to be speculating as to what we may or may not do.
Ultimately, as the current mandate comes to its end, we have to come back to government and provide advice as to how we would or would not want to extend the mission, and what that extension may or may not look like in the context of how the operational situation is evolving. Then, as it relates to the costing of that, that would be another step in the process.