My point, which I think is along the lines of what you're asking—and this is the critical item that gets lost in all of our discussions of procurement, the fundamental criticality of the cost and profit policy—is that our profit for the lease that we negotiated with the Government of Canada is within what the Government of Canada policy requires. The challenge you have—and I think this is where you're going with your questions—is that if you're a shipyard doing only government work, all the overhead of that project get put onto that one naval ship. It's very simple math that if you bring a second ship in that's not a government contract, half the overhead of the yard get assigned to that ship, so you're disincentivized from bringing in any commercial work when you have 100% government work. We're not set up that way. We don't have an umbrella agreement giving us 30 years' worth of work.
The last point I would make is that the risk you have for profit should correspond to how much risk you're taking on commercially. If someone tells you that you have 30 years' worth of work and there are billions of dollars.... Under the profit policy in Canada, the Government of Canada can give you only 1% to 7% profit, so the question is this. If it's above that in terms of contractual risk, are we following those policies? I would suggest that's something that has to be looked into. That's something the Auditor General has commented on.
