Perhaps I can close the loop on the questions that have come from the comments by Ms. Gallant and Mr. Bezan.
First, I'm defining this as a public hearing because I think there is a lot of public interest in this and the public will want to be made aware of the exact questions that we have. I think these are questions that are top of mind for a lot of Canadians. That's why I think it's very important that it be conducted in such a way that it gives the greatest access to the public receiving the information. On that point, I differentiate it from being a briefing.
With respect to the 45 days, in all honesty I debated the timing a bit. I settled on 45 days because I think it's important to have good content, as opposed to being expeditious and not having good content. My intent always was that it be held before the House resumes. I'd be open to changing it to 30 days, which would ensure that it happens before the House resumes. As Mr. Bezan said, it is important that we dedicate a specific block of time to this, which would be a lot more difficult to do after the House resumed. I'd be open to changing it to 30 days.