That's excellent. Then let's talk about the value or metrics for NATO overall because missions are a little dicier. There is the military execution leadership and our role in that. There's our role in thought leadership and one of the key things that you talked about is our relationships within our roles in NATO. In recent memory we have withdrawn a number of people at all levels, in NATO headquarters, in academia, or in research and development, or the Arctic, or any of those kinds of roles.
Back to your relationship conversation, do you think there's value in having and measuring the number of people involved in key areas, which we define as being integral to that which Canada is focused on at all levels within the broader NATO structure?