Thank you, sir, as always for the question.
As you know, there are a number of pillars in the strategy, including smaller vessels and maintenance. As laid out, it's still the intention that smaller vessels for both the Coast Guard and the navy.... A big one for us on the horizon is a project we call the naval large tugs that will go out competitively. The two shipyards that build larger ships, Irving Shipbuilding and Seaspan, are precluded from bidding on those smaller projects.
As well, there's maintenance. We've had the submarine maintenance contract, for example, which was a 15-year contract. It still has a few years to go, but it will be re-competed, as well as other maintenance. We've competed the in-service support contract for both the Arctic offshore patrol ships and joint support ships. That is now out. It was broader than just ship maintenance. It was broader...who it was competed to. This is a first for us where we have this large in-service support contract in place before the first ship gets delivered, so we're much more seamless in that transition. As the ships get built, they will also have to compete out work to maintain our auxiliary fleet, which is a fair-sized fleet, and our minor warships. Again, it has competed, and they then compete out work into shipyards. That overall contract will be re-competed. Per the strategy, there is a fair bit of work ahead for us, as well as for our colleagues at Coast Guard or elsewhere, that will look at smaller vessels and the maintenance in a competitive environment.