Thank you for the question. I think that a lot of what NATO has done with the agencies, starting in about 2012, has been extremely useful. I think I'm going to flip this around to what Canada could do.
For us as a nation, having access to the agency, what they do, and what they do competitively, and being able to use their contracts and their approach, where appropriate, is of great value.
There are areas where I would like to use it even more. At times we run into a debate or discussion about what it is, about whether it's sole-sourcing and whether we're kind of taking it out of Canadian industry and things of that nature. I would say it's about ensuring that we don't have barriers that prevent us from using the agency and the things they do—where appropriate, where we don't have the capability, where we may not already be in contract, and where it's not an issue of national security. I would look at it through that lens. In terms of NATO, it's to sharpen up more....
The other thing I would say is on this issue we talked about, the group of experts. As always with NATO, as it went through, there was a lot of debate and discussion. There are nations that would want to have much more control at every step of every project on almost a continuous basis. From my experience, even for ourselves, if there is that continuous oversight, it will never advance.