Yes. The NATO Parliamentary Assembly was the first international organization to formally sanction the Russians for their actions in Crimea and then, subsequently, Donbass. It took us all a bit by surprise, because although we expected sanctions to be imposed, Russia, which was then one of our partner countries, in fact had its status removed. We no longer have a Russian delegation participating, but our bureau—and Senator Day is one of its members—is mandated to discuss whether the conditions are right for seeking to re-establish dialogue with the Russians at every one of its meetings.
Interestingly enough, I'm in regular contact with my counterparts in, for example, the Council of Europe, which also imposed sanctions but did not remove their membership. The position now on the Russians within the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe is this: firstly, they've stopped funding it; secondly, they refuse to participate while there are any sanctions of any description imposed upon them. Indeed, they will only come back if the ability to sanction any delegation, for anything, is removed from the statutes of the parliamentary assembly. My guess is that since the Russians would inevitably have been sanctioned in some way, that they themselves wouldn't be participating. They're not interested in dialogue at the moment, I'm afraid. I wish that were not the case, because the opportunities for co-operation strategically, and the complementary capabilities, are amazing, but Russia is not playing at the moment.