In terms of military forces, I don't think there's any question that we're doing a great deal to protect those key cyber links, if you will. In many cases military forces and, of course, military communication systems, are isolated from the broad world. There are people who crack into more of the public links into them, but by and large on the military side, I don't think that's a major issue. It's with civilian critical infrastructure that you have the issue, and this becomes a very difficult question not only for governments to protect their own communication and electronic systems, but also for the private sector particularly, because most of these areas you think of on the North American energy grid are privately owned. The question then becomes, what is the private sector doing to protect their potential problems of hacking, both for malicious purposes or to steal secrets, or economic purposes. That's a dialogue that has to happen between government—not just the Canadian government—and its private sector. Because of the North American grids, if you will, the networks, it's a discussion that needs to take place between both.
I know, for example, that NORAD and NATO are also concerned about these things. I know, for example, that NORAD is part of the evolution of a North American defence study under way, which was blessed by the Permanent Joint Board on Defence, and is looking directly at cyber. But in my view, a lot of serious issues that emerge when you start to think about the military taking over to provide, or play the key role in, cybersecurity for the commercial side, and civil or civilian sectors. I don't think that's a path we want to go down.