Unanimous is important. I appreciate that very much, and I appreciate your support for that. It's something I believe in as well.
Professor Fergusson, I appreciated your opening comments.
I want to follow down the path that Mr. Gerretsen was going on.
Let's talk about the threat environment here in Canada. You mentioned both in the slides. You have the long-range aviation flight paths that are coming towards us over the Arctic. We have the potential intercontinental ballistic missiles that are coming from various sources. Then we have, I guess this contradiction that we belong to ballistic missile defence for Europe but we don't for North America.
I want you to lay it out again. Based upon the threat environment you just painted a picture of, where should Canada be investing its resources? What's the priority? Where should we be: one, two, and three?