Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to go back to Mr. Graham, on ballistic missile defence. You said, when we were talking about NATO's expansion to eastern Europe, that this was about protection of democracy, and that Russia simply didn't accept that so they had a different view. When you talked about ballistic missile defence, though, you said its capabilities are obviously so limited that Russia and China couldn't misunderstand that.
How do you square those two things at the same time? You just said in eastern Europe, where the objectives were clearly solidifying democracy, that Russia misunderstood that and responded. Why are they not capable of misinterpreting ballistic missile defence in the same way, as a threat to them, despite what you see as the facts?