Well, first of all, you're not alone in having problems with silos. We have them within departments here and between departments. Of course, that's why we created Homeland Security, to try to overcome that. Even that is not perfect. Don't underestimate the degree of problems we have of the sort you're referring to.
Yet your argument, as far as I'm concerned, is very central. What is of most concern, it seems to me, is that there be a real, on-time—whatever the term is—communication between the two governments regarding the identity of participants and what, in fact, they're doing. This requires a degree of surveillance that many of us find awkward in terms of our own societies. Internationally, it becomes even more difficult, yet that kind of information is crucial to coping with this particular problem. I know the governments are working hard at this. I know that sometimes these things are handled best informally, in terms of the context that the government people have back and forth. We should have the formal channels open and close, to the extent that we can, so there are no slip-ups. If there is a slip-up, both governments are going to pay a big political price for this, I think, because the public is so sensitized to this issue of security.