Let me zoom into something very specific, building on what you've said, and in the context of NORAD and air defence, and that would be the threat against Canada emanating from within Canada, conducted against a Canadian target. I'd like to zoom in specifically on the west coast and take you to the deployment of our current fighter assets in terms of geographic location, not in terms of the quality of the asset. Would you agree that proximity to a potential threat, or proximity to the potentially highest threat is important in our ability to interdict airborne threats against Canadian civilian targets?
