Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
You mentioned earlier that on the advice of the clerk, this amendment would be out of order and had been dealt with previously. I suspect that it's partly because Mr. Garrison's motion really is talking about an entirely different time frame. It's talking about Jason Kenney as “the Minister of Defence who originally appointed General Vance”. Then we have a run-on of names that were dealt with in a previous amendment, that are chronologically completely out of step.
With your indulgence, Madam Chair, I'd like to hear from the clerk his thoughts as to why this is out of order.