Mr. Walbourne, it's clear from the parliamentary committee in 2014, and also from a letter in your office, that you knew very well what the different avenues are. You didn't need to go to the minister to ask him “What should I do?” in a particular case. This is something where you could have gone to CFNIS, you could have gone to the SMRCs.... You could have referred the survivors anywhere, and yet you went to the minister saying “This is confidential and don't do anything about it.”
Of course, this is a GIC appointment, presuming that it is the CDS you were referring to. A GIC appointment is under PCO, so when the minister went to PCO, would that not have been the appropriate thing? He did it within a day. The minister did take action. He took the appropriate action, yet you're saying you went to him with something just to keep it confidential.
What exactly...? You have avenues you could have gone. Why, then, did you take it to the minister, knowing that a minister's office, a political office, is not the appropriate place to do this kind of investigation?