Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I guess my concern here is somewhat similar to Elizabeth's, in that we seem to have gotten focused in the committee on what Mr. Walbourne did or didn't do. He's been very frank with us about what he did and how that fit with his view of his responsibilities. The person who obviously was not frank with us in his appearance before the committee was the minister.
I will have a couple more questions for Mr. Walbourne, but I just want to note that, as I said in the last meeting, I think we do need to invite the minister back so that he can—now, taking into account Mr. Walbourne's testimony—see if he wishes to change anything that he had to say to us.
We now have a second chief of the defence staff. The current chief of the defence staff has stepped aside, as it's being characterized, because of an allegation of sexual misconduct.
Mr. Walbourne, would you have seen this as a possible outcome of the information that you took to the minister?