Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I just want to clarify a point.
I'm not asking for legal advice, Mr. Novak, but certainly the chief of the defence staff serves at the pleasure of government. Is that not correct? There was a member implying there would need to be some reason to remove a chief of the defence staff. If they serve at pleasure, could not the government decide a new chief of the defence staff could be necessary at any time?