You still answered my question.
As I understand it, when you heard rumours about Mr. Vance, you reported it to the Privy Council Office.
So in a way, the information was shared. It was noted that Mr. Sajjan also informed the Privy Council Office of the situation, which is quite normal.
Where I have more questions is that the minister did not want to see the file, but he informed the Privy Council Office of a potential problem. Yet the reaction of the Privy Council Office was to investigate the victim rather than General Vance.
Can you enlighten me further on this? Do you find this to be an appropriate action by the Privy Council?