I think that is a hypothetical of what might have followed. It's not clear to me how the national security adviser would have added anything to the equation at the time. We knew there had been something raised by the ombudsperson and the most direct route was to talk to the ombudsperson.
Maybe to help with further questions, it's not clear who else you would talk to. This was an anonymous complainant so we couldn't speak to her. There are no witnesses to a one-on-one incident so we couldn't speak to them. It would have been inappropriate to go and speak to the General because that would have raised a risk of reprisal. Frankly, the only person we could talk to was the ombudsman.