It's going to take a longer answer, and I'm happy to delve into that.
I think in the Westminster system there is always an answerable minister. Ministers have to be answerable to Parliament and Canadians for various things. Even with the court system, even with tribunals and independent bodies, there is a fundamental answerability to Parliament. For every body that Parliament appropriates funds for or creates through legislation, a minister is answerable.
That is not political interference. Political interference would be delving into the internal workings, interfering with a case. You can imagine different scenarios. I think there's a distinction, and also a line and a judgment to be called about when a minister who is answerable to Parliament should get involved, and how much.