It's an excellent question, and if you bear with me, I think there are a few layers to the answer.
Part of it is to recognize that it's a big problem and a challenge that goes beyond any one individual, and that lopping off the dandelions and changing the leadership at the top may have been necessary but wouldn't have been sufficient to put the Canadian Forces in the place that we want them to be.
If you look at the Wigston report in the United Kingdom—which I commend to the committee and anybody else who's watching—it's a comprehensive report on the same issue arising in the military of the United Kingdom. It's a very comprehensive blueprint for going forward with 36 recommendations, and the Johnson government committed to following up on it and has tabled follow-up reports every year on progress against that. I think some mechanism similar to that would be necessary.
I agree entirely with Mr. Lick that whatever body you parliamentarians decide to create, it should be legislated and permanent. I think one of the ways to go forward is that instead of waiting for the government to table a bill, this committee and the status of women committee could give the government advice on what the design features of the bill should be. I'd be happy to talk about that further.