I gather that, when it suits you, you let the officials speak, and when it doesn't suit you, you don't let them speak.
You suggested to the committee on March 12 that Mr. Walbourne hadn't done his job and that he could have given his information to people other than you.
Yet when we met with Mr. Lick, the current ombudsman—I don't remember whether it was in this committee or the Standing Committee on the Status of Women—he said that, if he had needed to act, he would have taken exactly the same steps as Mr. Walbourne.
In your opinion, do the former ombudsman and new ombudsman misunderstand the nature of their work, whereas you're correct?