As you know, and I believe you heard it from the former Clerk of the Privy Council last week, the chief of the defence staff, as a GIC appointment, serves at pleasure.
People tend to look at both the administrative and the criminal process of investigation as the same. They are different. The thresholds are different.
If through looking at the information you were to decide that the transgression is serious enough that it undermines the role to play, of course, information and advice could be presented to the Governor in Council to stop the appointment, but you have to have sufficient information to be able to determine that.
I think as you have seen from all the testimony so far, the problem has been that the information was not made available because the victim had fear of reprisal and was not prepared to share the information.