I think what you are really talking about here is looking at our culture writ large. What we really need to be having a look at is doing a systemic review to find out where those gaps are and where those deltas are in order to know whether to be.... It isn't just policy. It moves beyond there, but whether it be a policy.... It would be everything from the career paths that women follow and identifying the unintentional barriers that exist there, or to look at the equipment they wear: is it actually meant to help maximize [Technical difficulty—Editor]? On the more indirect side, we need to start really having a look at how we better tackle the permissive environment that allows types of misconduct to occur in the first place. I'm talking about all kinds of misconduct.
Then, recognizing the tightness of time, it's about making sure that we move forward and that there really is a true acknowledgement that there are inequalities in the Canadian Armed Forces, not just for women, but for all other marginalized groups who go there to serve. We have to acknowledge that there is an indifference towards pressing forward on women's issues. We can't just talk about senior levels. We have to go from the tactical level right through to senior level and talk about pockets of non-acceptance in how women serve. Then, finally, we need to be open and honest and listen to where unconscious biases are, basically making sure that we're fully consulting those who are most impacted by a system that wasn't built for us or by us.
That's really where I'd be looking.