Madam Chair, that is a fair interpretation. There's only one thing I would add, because often the comparison or contrast is made to what we've been learning and your committee has been learning about what happened with rumours and anonymous emails and things that came forward under the previous government. I think it's really important to notice where they are similar and where they are distinct.
Where they are distinct is that they had content that was still being followed up on the public service side. That was the appropriate place for the follow-up to happen, as officials who have come before you have already said. They had content to follow up on, but we didn't know anything, nor could the public service find out anything that they could follow up on.