Thank you.
I would like the committee to receive it before May 30.
By March 2, Mr. Wernick was aware of the allegations. A few months later, he recommended that a pay raise be given to General Vance. He discussed this with you and the Prime Minister. At that point, would it not have been appropriate to discuss the allegations?
Given that the information was known in July, that the ombudsman had filed a complaint and even resigned because of your reaction, was it not appropriate to talk with the Prime Minister about the problem with General Vance before giving him a pay raise and allowing him to continue to fulfill his mandate?