Thank you for the question. I will answer in English, as there are likely some technical terms I don't know in French.
Identifying deficiencies is one of the roles that we set out for the 3 Canadian Space Division when we stood it up. There was no operational authority within the Canadian Armed Forces up until that point to look at that. Really, we talk to our allies. We take a frank look at the adversarial threat that is out there. Almost on a daily basis, we learn something that we didn't know to begin with that will speak to what we should be doing from a capability development perspective. The nature of the threats and the nature of activities in the domain change on a regular, daily, weekly basis. Certainly we need to be, I think, agile in terms of how we look at that.
In terms of looking at capabilities we may not have now and ones that we might want to look at going forward, we have to do this in a holistic sense. We do something we call “allied by design” in terms of addressing how all of our allies work together to deliver space effects. We work very closely, obviously, with the Americans, with Australia, with the U.K. and others. There's no point in our building something that already exists. I think we have to have a complementarity in our capability development efforts in order for us to bring something relevant to the table and be of value to our allies. That's basically shaping the way that we're going forward and recognizing what we need to do next.