You said in response to an earlier question that it is unacceptable for reprisals to take place when people file grievances, yet we've heard from other witnesses that reprisals are subtle and are difficult to document or track, like one member just happens to not get the promotion that another member gets. Members are left to wonder what motivates any of a number of micro.... Promotion is a big thing, but there is a whole series of much smaller decisions that, in total, look like reprisals.
How will you address that? It's fair to say it's unacceptable. How would you recommend your successor ensure that reprisals do not happen?