Thank you for your questions.
Putting an absolute number on that is very difficult, the primary problem being that, as I suggested, a lot of the space infrastructure and satellites can be used for both civilian and military functions. A particular object or satellite may be performing a completely civilian role for a time and a season. If the government to which that satellite belongs decides to change that function or, perhaps more specifically, decides to use the data that the satellite is collecting for a military purpose, then there's no way we can stop that from happening, so I am somewhat reluctant to put a figure on military versus civilian. I think that is part of the challenge of operating in and understanding the space domain and the threat environment that is in the space domain.
In terms of private versus government, to take your question a little further, I think it is useful to see the breakdown by country, because the Chinese government obviously has a different relationship with Chinese private industry from what the United States has with U.S. private industry. Again, that raises the challenge of the dual-use problem and the public-private interface. I suggest that in the United States in particular, the private industry has a lead in what it is providing—we've seen that with SpaceX and Boeing in recent years—but a significant proportion of the need is also driven by armed forces. Again, I hesitate to put a number on that, but it's perhaps more useful to think broadly about what capabilities the United States and Canada require in space and whether those capabilities are being met.