I'll try to be very quick this time.
On the nuclear threat conversation, I'll be honest: I'm not a nuclear deterrence expert. I look at it from the sort of broader defence analytical perspective.
I do not see a very big nuclear risk at the moment. I think there is a lot of conversation. A nuclear threat is something that Russia likes to use every now and then when it wants to affect conversations, opinions and decisions, and we are again at that point.
I also want to caution against.... Really, you need to have a conversation about what it actually is to have.... Sometimes you talk about the use of a tactical nuclear weapon as a deterrent, but you actually have to think about what it means to use a tactical nuclear weapon. Where would it be used, how would it be detonated and what kind of impact would it have and where?
Then you really have the realistic understanding of whether that is going to work as a deterrent, as escalation or not. I think the part of the conversation that we sometimes forget about is what it actually means in practice.