No. If you look at any of the open sources that have examined what we did following the promises of “Strong, Secure, Engaged” and then subsequently look at the promises that were made in June 2022, the open source literature tells us that we basically haven't met any of those promises.
The real problem at the heart of your excellent question, though, is that we have created a politicized element of confidentiality. We say we can't talk about this in the open because we don't want to let our enemies know. We know our enemies have efficient ways, and they probably know already. Really what it does is it prevents any of the public discourse and discussions that we are much more willing to have when it comes to the problem of climate change.
That's really at the heart of what you're talking about. It's that we are not sharing the information that is necessary for people such as me or Justin to actually make any engagements of understanding just how bad or how good we've been.