Thank you.
I was wondering.... Sometimes it's hard for people to think about this in terms of the number of housing units. When we think about those 11,000 units, I think I saw in the DPU that we were short 7,000—around 7,000, usually 6,000 or 7,000—and there's $295 million earmarked to be spent, I think, up until 2032-33. That works out to about $1,800 per housing unit over that span of time.
When you think about that amount of money to build and to do 2,500 renos, and if we're short 6,000 units, does the government need to think about allocating more money to housing? Is that a way in which we can raise morale in the forces and a fairly low-cost way of doing it? At a time when we need the most out of our people, can we spend our money on our people? In the DPU, there were 36 recommendations, and 25% of them had to do with HR. To me, this is a key one.
Like I said, we need the most out of our people. Is this a great way to target that?