Yes, absolutely.
There's been a lot of discussion and movement on understanding the implications of artificial intelligence for the military and the Department of National Defence. However, much more needs to be done. I think we are one of the first countries to have an AI strategy, but the strategy is more of a guidance or vision document. It's not really telling us what the policies are. I think the hard work that needs to come now is really developing those policies.
We have the AI talent, as I said earlier, and we have the legal and technical expertise. I think we can be a leader in this sphere. We've generally been a leader in broader discussions on AI, but on military discussions of AI, again, because of capacity issues at both GAC and DND, we have not had the role I think we could be playing, because there is simply an issue of capacity. We need to address that.
It's both to leverage AI for defence, but also to consider the ethical and legal implications that our other allies are concerned with. Even in UN discussions, we're not at the forefront highlighting ethical and legal concerns, simply because we do not seem to have political vision on how we wish to proceed with the technology. Political vision has to come on this file. It's not a matter of a lack of legal or technical expertise.